Legal is Cyntia Intelligence pointed at one kind of work: reading contracts and comparing their versions, drafting deeds and agreements, reading plans, and checking that a document says what it has to say. It is not another system to learn — it is the same one, with the criteria a legal team would have applied written into the frame.
This is the diagram from Intelligence, and that is on purpose: underneath, it is the same engine. A document comes in, the rules frame what the model may conclude, and what comes out is one answer instead of three. What Legal changes is who writes the rules.
Ask a general model about a clause and it will answer. Ask it twice and it may answer differently. That is fine for a summary and useless for a contract, because what matters is not that the answer sounds right — it is that it can be defended, and that the next one matches it.
The criteria are written down before anything is read: which clauses have to be there, what counts as a change of substance, what a plan has to comply with. The model works inside them, so the answer is the same on Monday and on Friday and somebody can say where it came from.
A contract to review, two versions to compare, a plan to read, a draft to produce. They come in from wherever the work already comes in from, and they come back with the criteria applied and with the reasoning attached.
Reading a plan is not reading a document, and it is the part that surprises people: what a drawing has to comply with can be checked in the same pass as the clauses of the contract that commissioned it.
Four jobs. All four run on Intelligence; what makes them legal is the criteria they are held to.
Clause by clause against what your side requires. Not a summary of the contract — a list of what is missing, what changed and what you would not have signed.
What moved between the draft that went out and the one that came back. The dangerous edit is never the one they told you about.
Deeds, contracts and agreements produced from the house templates, with the data of the case already in them. Somebody still signs it; nobody has to retype it.
Vision over drawings: what is there, what is missing, and whether it complies with what it had to comply with.
The forty-page one that came back from the other side with «minor changes». Tell us what your side never signs without, and we will send you back the list of what moved.
Talk to us